Check More options

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

Information

Year
2001
Rating *
8.7
Votes *
382,679
Checks
17,840
Favs
1,712
Dislikes
106
Comments
12 comments
* View IMDb information

Last checks

Splatt...
September 3, 2010
happyl...
September 3, 2010
Mother D
September 3, 2010
mlehto
September 3, 2010
tigerl...
September 2, 2010

Last favorites

Toquar79
September 2, 2010
Sryden42
September 2, 2010
Fludae
September 1, 2010
rycar88
September 1, 2010
Marylua
September 1, 2010

12 comments

Do you want to let us know what you think of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 10 of 12

brian_fuller's avatar
2 days 13 hours ago brian_fuller said:

Tolkein is, admittedly, the gold-standard of fantasy world-makers, but his plotting is fairly weak and predictably linear. Fortunately, that's a pretty perfect combination for adolescent readers who are weaning themselves of childhood fiction. Tolkein gives twelve-year-olds (the age at which many fans first visit Middle Earth) the complexity of detailed settings without demanding too much in the way of parallel storylines. The triumph of friendship over greed and moral right over military might are conservative themes as easily grasped as the story's sparse plot lines. When Tolkein's young readers grow up, they no doubt take with them a fondness for these tales, even though they graduate to far more complicated narratives. Peter Jackson's films awaken that nostalgic warmth -- with all its benefits and shortcomings. Honestly: ring here, volcano there. Nine hours in between?
MariusMariusMarius's avatar
1 month ago MariusMariusMarius said:

Way better than the other two.
aneic's avatar
1 month 3 weeks ago aneic said:

Best of the bunch. Truest in spirit to Tolkien's work.
carljbachus's avatar
4 months 1 week ago carljbachus said:

Long ass movie. It's good, just long as hell.
Ashrzr's avatar
4 months 2 weeks ago Ashrzr said:

*highly rated
Ashrzr's avatar
4 months 2 weeks ago Ashrzr said:

I don't understand why this is so highly better. It was just like a slightly better Harry Potter movie to me. It's the equivalent of the Half Blood Prince being nominated for Best Picture. This was pretty good, but I hope the next two are better.
stellaslove's avatar
9 months 2 weeks ago stellaslove said:

Definitely over-rated.. but then I didnt like the book either - which makes me one very few, i know - I just don't find the characters to be endearing or interesting at all - i feel nothing toward them. I havent seen the next two, but i might try and watch them one day to see if they are better...
Hadis's avatar
10 months 2 weeks ago Hadis said:

Haha, you made me laugh squeamish.
squeamish movie lover's avatar
10 months 2 weeks ago squeamish movie lover said:

I find it overrated. Jackson's King Kong is far better.
Parlay's avatar
11 months 1 week ago Parlay said:

Mijn favoriet!