Check
- Mark movie as favorite
- Dislike this movie
- Add movie to watchlist
- Mark movie as owned
- Check movie
- View the official lists that include A Field in England
- Visit IMDb page
A Field in England (2013)'s comments
Order by:
- Info
- In lists (160)
- Comments (12)
- Friends
- Activity
- Checks (1457)
- Favorites (115)
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 12 of 12
jlfitz
https://tubitv.com/video/319702/a_field_in_englandSiskoid
Ben Wheatley's A Field in England is an oddity built of oddities. Shot in moody black and white, it tells the tale of four deserters walking away from a battle during the English Civil War. Then a fifth man shows up and his sorcerer's ways peg him as devilish and things get really strange - actors in unmoving tableaux, a man dragged out of nowhere with a massive rope, and a beautiful wizarding battle using optical effects and strobe-editing (worth the price of admission just for that). So what's happening? It's a Wheatley film, so we're unlikely to all agree on a single explanation. Certainly, there's a pervasive sense that we're in a kind of Purgatory where souls cyclically purge sins such as cowardice, pride, gluttony and lust. Is Whitehead's master an astrologer, God Himself, or the sin that governs his actions? Or is none of that important, it just happens to be a thought I had early on through which I interpreted the proceedings? But even if you're not looking for (or at least finding) answers, A Field in England still has some stylish moments, nice music (I like the soldier's song), humor, and some excellent, literary dialog.Marasmusine
Could've done with more Julian Barratt, was hoping he would reappear near the end.Mhrass
Brilliant, Loved it.RaggedReels
I don't know what to say about this film. It is certainly daring, it is certainly interesting, but the plot as mentioned is heavily under explored. I feel a little dazed. Some beautiful camera work though.MarkE89
The film is a pretentious mess with some nice imagery, a great score and, unfortunately, nothing to tie it all together. The script is too film-schooly and boasts an immature love for brusque statements and Tarkovsky-like metaphors, both of which are handled poorly. While Wheatley is usually adept at such strange material, he seems to have been preoccupied with using this entire thing (including distribution) as a fun experiment. Which it clearly might have been. For him.Otherwise, Michael Smiley does a great job as the harrowing "alchemist".
tommodee
As an earlier comment noted, I feel a little bit dazed after watching this. It was visually striking, well scripted, and boasts an 'otherness' that lends an endearing quality.I'll be thinking about it for days, I can tell. I can't wait to watch it again.
Ralf
Well put!
MoutardedShroom
Holy shit this movie!This is a reminder that great films don't need big money or follow a successful formula, but instead can work on just an interesting concept and a clear vision.
Uncompromising cinema at its (almost) best.
CSSCHNEIDER
I''ve been a bit less than tepid toward Ben Wheatley's films, but this, this comes so close to greatness. It tips toward lesser at about the halfway point. It remains interesting, but boy it comes close to real horror, real art, and fantastic cinema. Still, one of the better films I've seen this year, but not the instant classic it came so close to being.RoastMutton10
Another strong (and suitably weird) entry for Ben Wheatley's filmography. I recommend seeing it at the cinema if possible, although it is a strange feeling coming home with the knowledge I could catch its television debut under an hour later.TalkingElvish
Fantastic daringly original film, full of visual ingenuity and with truly chilling, hilarious and beautiful scenes. Though the story is a little underexplored, the dialogue is brilliant and for what is essentially five guys in a field with some cheap effects and period props and costumes, this is an amazing film.