Remove ads

Information

Year
2019
Runtime
128 min.
Director
Guy Ritchie
Genres
Romance, Adventure, Fantasy, Family, Musical
Rating *
7.0
Votes *
0
Checks
3,422
Favs
98
Dislikes
68
Favs/checks
2.9% (1:35)
Favs/dislikes
1:1
* View IMDb information

Top comments

  1. buc86's avatar

    buc86

    Songs are good, there were a few extra things they either added or expanded on. But other than that there isn't much about this film that's better than the original. There isn't also a lot of stuff that isn't done as well. A lot of the changes don't even make sense to me, like the "it's not often you see a horse with two rear ends" line is gone and there is even a moment in the film where they could have put it.

    Will Smith is decent enough as the genie, but come on! is he really on par with Robin Williams? I think not!

    If you've never seen the original, it might be worth seeing. But if you have seen it, this doesn't offer enough that's new or better to really make it worth your time.
    1 year 7 months ago
  2. Emiam's avatar

    Emiam

    6+/10
    Better than expected.
    1 year 3 months ago
  3. xianjiro's avatar

    xianjiro

    The problem with remakes is your work will inevitably be compared to the original - change too much and you're not staying true, change too little and it's an imitation. Alas, this is genie's curse. Speaking of Genie, Smith does bring his own style to the role and besides production design and production numbers, is the film's bright spot. Massoud and Scott are fine, but Massoud's performance struck me as imitation and boy can that Scott nail the Disney princess song, so nothing new there. Alas, Kenzari starts out okay but his performance turns into an overly animated cartoon of one of the great Disney cartoon villains and is tolerated by a few and hated by most. Then there's the odd cultural mishmash, but that's always been an issue with Disney's Aladdin, but at least Gottfried helped us forget parrots are a South American thing. Since Aladdin was added to a French translation of Les mille et une nuits in the early 1700s - well, I guess it could've happened. And tigers make great palace-pets. I'm also thinking someone has seen a few Bollywood production numbers as well. Other than that, one can nitpick if one wants. It's an average movie that's somewhat entertaining if you go for this sort of thing (I do and I was mildly entertained), but that's about it. 1 year 3 months ago
See all comments

Friends

Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!

Activity

  1. whilligoss checked this movie 11 hours 15 minutes ago
  2. jhunton checked this movie 12 hours 54 minutes ago
  3. Spiralwarrior and Arnar Ingi disliked this movie 2 days 11 hours ago
  4. Inkui, flaviaost, Nizqa, and 2 others Cinematicsofia and lalatature checked this movie 3 days 17 hours ago
  5. Lindakjrthomsen, bmiles76, Roberto_BOZ and 1 other rachels172 checked this movie 5 days 9 hours ago
See more activity

In 2 official lists

  1. This movie ranks #39 in Box Office Mojo's All Time Worldwide Box Office
    Box Office Mojo's All Time Worldwide Box Office's icon

    Box Office Mojo's All Ti…

    39
  2. This movie ranks #201 in Box Office Mojo's All Time Adjusted Box Office
    Box Office Mojo's All Time Adjusted Box Office's icon

    Box Office Mojo's All Ti…

    201
View all lists this movie is in