a little disappointed in this. While the performances of Depp and Edgerton were really good, others like Cumberbatch and Bacon were not. That and a lack of emotional depth and suspense made the movie's run time feel longer than it was. Depp is back to his A-Game form, but it wasnt enough to make this movie a classic. 6/10
Johnny Depp returns to a real life information in Black Mass, though unlike Donny Brasco, Whitey Bulger uses his FBI connection to make himself the most powerful crime lord in 1970s-80s Boston. It's not an uninteresting story, and Depp is quite restrained (I could even forget it was him under the bald head and blue eyes, which I didn't think could happen anymore), but it suffers from Scorsese envy. All real crime films seem to fall into a similar pattern, a rise and fall of incidents from whatever book strung together to shock or illuminate. Scorsese is the best of the best at this, somehow making his longish films seem worth it at the end, where he puts an inspired button on his film. Not so here. The film is well shot and creates a bleached out, stark and decaying South Boston, with some good, creepy moments for the villain, the ending is anti-climactic at best. I know it follows true events, but the way it's presented, it seems abrupt and flat. The theme of loyalty and betrayal is fairly obvious, but satisfyingly returns in different ways again and again, but why his FBI connection would BE so loyal to him isn't explored sufficiently. So mostly good, but probably not all that memorable in the long run.
A well-made and moderately entertaining gangster film that falls short of greatness simply because it does absolutely nothing that we haven't seen done countless times before much better. There's no one standout element or even scene to really differentiate this from its peers, and even Depp's much-lauded performance, whilst impressive, is only truly noteworthy because it finally arrests the downwards spiral that he's been in lately.
This is made all the more frustrating because there's a great film hidden here somewhere. Maybe one focusing more on Edgerton's John Connelly with the far less interesting Bulger as a supporting character, or maybe one built solely around the takedown of the Italian Mafia, which drives the first half of the movie before promptly being resolved in an inconsequential and anti-climactic manner with over an hour left in the film. These possibilities however are lost in director Cooper's insistence on showing all the real life events in a chronological, straightforward, and sombre fashion, one after the other, almost as if he and the screenwriters had a checklist of key moments they were dispassionately ticking off as they went. Bulger did this. Then Bulger did this. Then, oh! He also did this. It may be an admirable approach to historical realism, but it does not make for a compelling narrative in this case, absent character development and dramatic tension.
I had a similar feeling of wasted potential in regards to Cooper's previous effort Out Of The Furnace, which also received a lot of awards buzz before not really leaving its mark. There's no doubting that he's a very competent director however, and hopefully his next feature packs that extra something special that this is lacking.
Good Performance by Depp and a great supporting cast but overal I found the movie a bit dissapointing. Lacked tension and exitement and had a VERY familiair feel to it.
I liked it. However, as mentioned by previous posters, it seemed to lack a certain intensity to it that disqualifies it from really entering the annals of great crime/gangster pictures. A solid watch nonetheless.
Bad directing, weak script, actors felt bored doing it and Johnny Depp's performance was only good in a couple of scenes and it was down to the makeup mostly too.
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
nowhereman136
a little disappointed in this. While the performances of Depp and Edgerton were really good, others like Cumberbatch and Bacon were not. That and a lack of emotional depth and suspense made the movie's run time feel longer than it was. Depp is back to his A-Game form, but it wasnt enough to make this movie a classic. 6/10Siskoid
Johnny Depp returns to a real life information in Black Mass, though unlike Donny Brasco, Whitey Bulger uses his FBI connection to make himself the most powerful crime lord in 1970s-80s Boston. It's not an uninteresting story, and Depp is quite restrained (I could even forget it was him under the bald head and blue eyes, which I didn't think could happen anymore), but it suffers from Scorsese envy. All real crime films seem to fall into a similar pattern, a rise and fall of incidents from whatever book strung together to shock or illuminate. Scorsese is the best of the best at this, somehow making his longish films seem worth it at the end, where he puts an inspired button on his film. Not so here. The film is well shot and creates a bleached out, stark and decaying South Boston, with some good, creepy moments for the villain, the ending is anti-climactic at best. I know it follows true events, but the way it's presented, it seems abrupt and flat. The theme of loyalty and betrayal is fairly obvious, but satisfyingly returns in different ways again and again, but why his FBI connection would BE so loyal to him isn't explored sufficiently. So mostly good, but probably not all that memorable in the long run.lachyas
A well-made and moderately entertaining gangster film that falls short of greatness simply because it does absolutely nothing that we haven't seen done countless times before much better. There's no one standout element or even scene to really differentiate this from its peers, and even Depp's much-lauded performance, whilst impressive, is only truly noteworthy because it finally arrests the downwards spiral that he's been in lately.This is made all the more frustrating because there's a great film hidden here somewhere. Maybe one focusing more on Edgerton's John Connelly with the far less interesting Bulger as a supporting character, or maybe one built solely around the takedown of the Italian Mafia, which drives the first half of the movie before promptly being resolved in an inconsequential and anti-climactic manner with over an hour left in the film. These possibilities however are lost in director Cooper's insistence on showing all the real life events in a chronological, straightforward, and sombre fashion, one after the other, almost as if he and the screenwriters had a checklist of key moments they were dispassionately ticking off as they went. Bulger did this. Then Bulger did this. Then, oh! He also did this. It may be an admirable approach to historical realism, but it does not make for a compelling narrative in this case, absent character development and dramatic tension.
I had a similar feeling of wasted potential in regards to Cooper's previous effort Out Of The Furnace, which also received a lot of awards buzz before not really leaving its mark. There's no doubting that he's a very competent director however, and hopefully his next feature packs that extra something special that this is lacking.
Supposeably
Black S**tEarring72
Good Performance by Depp and a great supporting cast but overal I found the movie a bit dissapointing. Lacked tension and exitement and had a VERY familiair feel to it.acoltismypassport
I liked it. However, as mentioned by previous posters, it seemed to lack a certain intensity to it that disqualifies it from really entering the annals of great crime/gangster pictures. A solid watch nonetheless.Youssef Othman
Bad directing, weak script, actors felt bored doing it and Johnny Depp's performance was only good in a couple of scenes and it was down to the makeup mostly too.A wasted opportunity for a great crime thriller
Hellbent Exodus
How can I take this film seriously when Johnny Depp looks so ridiculous? This terrible casting choice ruins the movie outright.americanadian25
Movie was just okay, but Johnny Depp's performance elevated it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhYHASaePMc