Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 15 of 16

Ninjagodzilla's avatar

Ninjagodzilla

Maybe the weakest of the connery Bond films.
12 years 5 months ago
CDF's avatar

CDF

The problem with this film is that it introduces gadgets that are never used.
13 years 2 months ago
nicolaskrizan's avatar

nicolaskrizan

oldie but goldie

http://beyond1001movies.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/backtrack-goldfinger-1964/
9 years 6 months ago
muddi900's avatar

muddi900

Probably one of the worst action movies ever. It doesn't even work as a piece of propaganda that it was supposed to be. Our capitalist hero stumbles into trouble everywhere, getting his allies killed and failing in every endeavour he sets out for, and saving the day by raping a lesbian.

The soviet machinery must shaking in their boots.
9 years 10 months ago
Rohit's avatar

Rohit

Man, this is so stupid
12 years 6 months ago
MathianSim's avatar

MathianSim

My favourite bond film
12 years 9 months ago
Earring72's avatar

Earring72

The 3rd Bond movie and remains the template for all coming Bonds. One of the best!
4 weeks 1 day ago
vishnu's avatar

vishnu

Perfect - the beginning, the middle and the ending.
11 years 4 months ago
saydin7's avatar

saydin7

very entertaining, easy to watch.
11 years 10 months ago
Dieguito's avatar

Dieguito

One of the 3 best Bond movies
12 years 8 months ago
tigh66's avatar

tigh66

The most entertaining Bond film, though not the best as it sometimes gets called.
13 years 10 months ago
RoastMutton10's avatar

RoastMutton10

Definitely not the weakest of the Connery Bond films! That would go to You Only Live Twice, although the Blofeld scenes are great.
12 years 4 months ago
Runar's avatar

Runar

Why is that a problem? It is actually very plausible that he don't get to use all the gadgets that are made for him.
13 years 2 months ago
Siskoid's avatar

Siskoid

Guy Hamilton replaces Terence Young as director with Goldfinger, a film that re-energizes the franchise and really defines the genre as it is still known today. For good or ill, I should say, since of Goldfinger's features were taken to abominable extremes in the Roger Moore era. From now on, the Bond films are more outrageous and comedic (the laser table scene is only the best known example), are full of neat gadgets, and we can really call them action films as opposed to spy thrillers. Auric Goldfinger and Oddjob are iconic, Pussy Galore has that name and a squadron of Amazon pilots, there's a weird murder that leaves a girl painted gold, and the villain builds a huge model of Fort Knox's environs because, well, because Ken Adam is the god of production design. We also get the first proper teaser before the story begins, and it's as sharply written, violent, sexy and witty as the rest, and the first proper "hit song" with credits rolling around on girls. There are only two things missing from the formula and that's exotic location work (Kentucky highways are really a step down, though I appreciated the Swiss Alps), and James Bond actually being effective. This is a story in which he spends most of his time as a captive, he rebuffed by two Bond girls, stupidly crashes the Aston-Martin, and is shown up by an unnamed extra in the climactic atomic bomb scene. But we're almost there!
6 years 4 months ago
fkos's avatar

fkos

I really don't understand some of the comments. As an avid Bond fan, I can easily say that this is one of, if not the, best Bond film.
11 years 11 months ago

Showing items 1 – 15 of 16

View comments