Remove ads

Information

Year
2017
Runtime
98 min.
Director
Johnny Martin
Genres
Crime, Thriller, Mystery
Rating *
5.1
Votes *
0
Checks
169
Favs
4
Dislikes
17
Favs/checks
2.4% (1:42)
Favs/dislikes
1:4
* View IMDb information

Top comments

  1. filmclub's avatar

    filmclub

    MEH 1 year 3 months ago
  2. Earring72's avatar

    Earring72

    BAD just bad serial killer movie. Full of plotholes and low on thrills. Pacino is one of my all time favorite actors......what a waste 1 year 4 months ago
  3. ikkegoemikke's avatar

    ikkegoemikke

    “Have you noticed anything out of the ordinary?
    There’s a letter carved into her chest.
    A game of Hangman. “


    image

    Mix the game show “Wheel of fortune” with a “Se7en” -ish thriller and you get a movie like “Hangman“. A film in which two detectives, Ruiney (Karl “Dredd” Urban) and Archer (Al Pacino), are chasing a ruthless serial killer. The victims are related to each other in a thoughtful way. Fortunately, there’s also this journalist Christi (Brittany “Bushwick” Snow) who provides the two seasoned detectives with ingenious clues at the right time. Probably that’s why she’s nominated for the Pulitzer prize. The crazy game the killer plays, is the famous “Hangman” game. And although Archer, as a retired detective, kills (no pun intended) his time while solving crossword puzzles in Latin, the solution of the puzzle doesn’t seem to be so self-evident.

    “Hangman” isn’t such a bad movie per se. To be honest, they succeeded in making it pretty exciting at certain times. But just like the game “Hangman”, its course is rather too linear and too obvious. The way some clues are found, is sometimes quite ridiculous. If all investigators were as inventive as this duo, solving murder cases would be a piece of cake. The most annoying thing in this film was the interference of the crime journalist Christi who, as a would-be authority in the field of murder cases, asked the right questions at the right time and interpreted clues in a perceptive way. The picture with the body of detective Ruiney’s wife contained such an obvious clue. It’s almost incomprehensible that these experienced detectives never noticed it. But no problem for our brilliant journalist. One look of her at the picture in question and she already knew what the others had overlooked.

    Even though Al Pacino isn’t written off as an actor yet and in my opinion he can still bring the quality of a feature film to a higher level thanks to his brilliant acting, his contribution here is somewhat a disappointment. “Manglehorn” is a perfect example of a film where Pacino demonstrated his class and professionalism as an actor. Even though this film is contentwise nothing to write home about, this class actor made it a fascinating spectacle. My conclussion was very simple. The film in question wasn’t necessary to prove that Pacino is an exquisite actor. This conclussion also applies to “Hangman“. The recruitment of sounding names guarantees the required media attention. But I’m not sure if this movie deserves that.

    Without Al Pacino, Karl Urban and Brittany Snow, this film would be nothing more than a typical Saturday night movie about a serial killer who’s fond of word games. The film will easily overshadow other crappy weekend films and certainly guarantees a pleasant evening in front of the tube. On the one hand it is recommended for lovers of the serial killer genre. On the other hand, the result is rather dull and uninspiring. Certainly not something to get excited about. And Al Pacino can’t fix it either.

    More reviews here
    3 years 4 months ago
See all comments

Friends

Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!

Activity

  1. We didn't record any activity between now and 1 week ago.
See more activity

In 0 official lists

View all lists this movie is in