Remove ads

Information

Year
1963
Runtime
112 min.
Director
Martin Ritt
Genre
Drama
Rating *
7.9
Votes *
14,923
Checks
2,930
Favs
240
Dislikes
8
Favs/checks
8.2% (1:12)
Favs/dislikes
30:1
* View IMDb information

Top comments

  1. Siskoid's avatar

    Siskoid

    It's more common now, but 1963's Hud kind of broke the rules with its irredeemable lead character, Hud Bannon. For the most part, fiction is transformative. We're looking at characters' lives during a crisis moment where they will "arc", learn something, suffer a change, etc. Hud's world changes (by emptying, mostly), but he doesn't, not a jot. He's a jerk at the start, and he stays a jerk. We know him better, so maybe he's even worse. Hud has a lot in common with Martin Ritt and Paul Newman's later production of Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, but that one has a transformation in store for the lead. The crisis in this case is the potential loss of a ranch's cattle to disease and how it could destroy the fortunes of three men, all that is left of a ranching family. The youngest (Brandon De Wilde) is caught between his grandfather (Melvyn Douglas), a proud and ethical rancher, and his uncle Hud (Newman), who is ready to break all the rules to ensure his inheritance. There's a line that resonates strongly: "Little by little the look of the country changes because of the men we admire." That's De Wilde's dilemma, and one gets the feeling it is also America's as a whole. It's interesting that by 1963 standards, the movie seems to exalt conservative values and condemn Hud as a liberal libertine, but today, Hud's greed and corruption would be better recognized as one of the worst strands of modern conservatism. Whatever it's saying, the best reason to watch Hud is Patricia Neal's turn as the family's earthy housekeeper, a wonderful performance that has you sit up every time she's on screen. She's captivating in whatever role she must play with each of the Bannons. 7 months 2 weeks ago
  2. dombrewer's avatar

    dombrewer

    Very high quality family drama set on a ranch near small town Texas - the screenplay, cinematography, direction and performances from the four central characters are all first rate. The only negative is the sheer bleakness of the story - it doesn't end well for anybody, and there's no lightness to relieve the gloom apart from the pleasure of watching a story well told. 8 years 1 month ago
  3. corchap's avatar

    corchap

    Gorgeous black and white print on Panavision 4 months 3 weeks ago
See all comments

Friends

Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!

Activity

  1. Myke favorited this movie 5 days 5 hours ago
  2. cinesmith checked this movie 6 days 2 hours ago
See more activity

In 8 official lists

  1. This movie ranks #30 in IMDb's Western Top 50
    IMDb's Western Top 50's icon

    IMDb's Western Top 50

    30
  2. This movie ranks #62 in Academy Award - Best Cinematography
    Academy Award - Best Cinematography's icon

    Academy Award - Best Cin…

    62
  3. This movie ranks #244 in Halliwell's Top 1000: The Ultimate Movie Countdown
    Halliwell's Top 1000: The Ultimate Movie Countdown's icon

    Halliwell's Top 1000: Th…

    244
  4. This movie ranks #392 in The New York Times's Book of Movies
    The New York Times's Book of Movies's icon

    The New York Times's Boo…

    392
  5. This movie ranks #397 in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
    1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die's icon

    1001 Movies You Must See…

    397
  6. This movie ranks #423 in The Guardian's 1000 Films to See Before You Die
    The Guardian's 1000 Films to See Before You Die's icon

    The Guardian's 1000 Film…

    423
  7. This movie ranks #620 in TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest Films: 1001-2000
    TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest Films: 1001-2000's icon

    TSPDT's 1,000 Greatest F…

    620
  8. This movie ranks #792 in Library of Congress's National Film Registry
    Library of Congress's National Film Registry's icon

    Library of Congress's Na…

    792
View all lists this movie is in