I didn't know what to expect as I haven't read the book, but I thought it was such a beautiful movie, one could really feel the tension and the strong bond of love between the characters. I thought the actors did a brilliant job and I loved it.
2011's adaptation of Jane Eyre, with rising star Mia Wasikowska in the lead role and Michael Fassbender as the damn peculiar (everyone's peculiar on Planet Bronte except for Judi Dench's Mrs. Fairfax, really) Lord Rochester, is the essence of Gothic. Dressed up as a ghost story, with frequent allusions to the world of fairies and goblins and strange happenstance, the book and film use Jane's limited point of view (which is not the same as a limited mind) to create strangeness and fear. The fuller picture - no less "horrific" - is something the audience puts together over time. And of course, it also serves as background metaphor for a young woman's inner turmoil. Jane is one of those pre-feminist figures that seems shocking in the context of when she was put to paper, insolent with the Church, completely convinced that the soul transcends class and makes all human beings equal, and ambitious in her need to expand her horizons and create choices for herself. Jane Eyre is grand, literate melodrama, with bizarre characters and dark situations, and the film captures that more than adequately, using cinematic techniques (like achronological editing) to heighten the mystery.
Decided to watch this after finishing the book. The cinematography is beautiful, but the script adaptation lacks the depth the book had.
There are light of light hearted moments, often time quite funny, that shows both Jane and Mr. Rochester's characters in full depth. Here, it focuses much more on the doom and gloom of Jane Eyre's life. You really see here become independent and self-aware in the book, in the film those aspects are missing.
At the end, you don't really get the sense that she has become this independent woman, but still the little girl she was at the beginning when she arrives at Thornfield.
The same goes for Mr. Rochester. In the book there's a moment where he dresses up as a gypsy to try break down Jane's defensive character. It's fun and playful scene in the book and really contrasts with his moments of pride and seriousness.
Impressive awkwardness, and I felt like the movie stayed true to the book's mood. Having the lovely Mia as a gray, girl-next-door type is a waste, but she played it well. I missed some chemistry between the protagonists. I preferred the Jane Eyre mini-series, and recommend it.
If you're thinking about watching one Jane Eyre-themed film, watch this one. Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender are breathtaking. The story is of course familiar to us all I believe, so there's nothing new about that.
Undoubtedly the best Jane Eyre adaptation to date. The setting and atmosphere captured the book perfectly. The narritive flowed beautifully but didnt feel the need to stick religiously to the flow of the book 100% which is a plus in my opinion. Wasikowska and Fassbender captured the essence of Jane and Rochester wonderfully. A marvellous film.
Brilliant film. It's rare to enjoy a film so much when you have read the book but this really was great. They've got the characterisation of Jane and Rochester perfect. The mood, style, everything is reminiscent of the book. The best of all the adaptations I have seen. Does the book justice.
It's all dark, gloomy and dreary. It has stars like Mia Wasikowska, Michael Fassbender and Jamie Bell. But still, I love the 2006's BBC's version more. Ruth Wilson is more of a Jane Eyre than Wasikowska and so Stephens of a Rochester than Fassbender.
Besides, if only Fukunaga lightens up the tone, offers a bit color and adds more fun to the story, it will be the best version of Jane Eyre, like Roger Ebert claimed on his site.
However, as the reader of the novel, I think this one is more loyal to the novel, compared to the BBC's version.
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 15 of 24
greennui
Striking cinematography, good acting performances, but seemed to lack a bit of heart and chemistry.MewSa
I didn't know what to expect as I haven't read the book, but I thought it was such a beautiful movie, one could really feel the tension and the strong bond of love between the characters. I thought the actors did a brilliant job and I loved it.Siskoid
2011's adaptation of Jane Eyre, with rising star Mia Wasikowska in the lead role and Michael Fassbender as the damn peculiar (everyone's peculiar on Planet Bronte except for Judi Dench's Mrs. Fairfax, really) Lord Rochester, is the essence of Gothic. Dressed up as a ghost story, with frequent allusions to the world of fairies and goblins and strange happenstance, the book and film use Jane's limited point of view (which is not the same as a limited mind) to create strangeness and fear. The fuller picture - no less "horrific" - is something the audience puts together over time. And of course, it also serves as background metaphor for a young woman's inner turmoil. Jane is one of those pre-feminist figures that seems shocking in the context of when she was put to paper, insolent with the Church, completely convinced that the soul transcends class and makes all human beings equal, and ambitious in her need to expand her horizons and create choices for herself. Jane Eyre is grand, literate melodrama, with bizarre characters and dark situations, and the film captures that more than adequately, using cinematic techniques (like achronological editing) to heighten the mystery.NuclearPlanet
Decided to watch this after finishing the book. The cinematography is beautiful, but the script adaptation lacks the depth the book had.There are light of light hearted moments, often time quite funny, that shows both Jane and Mr. Rochester's characters in full depth. Here, it focuses much more on the doom and gloom of Jane Eyre's life. You really see here become independent and self-aware in the book, in the film those aspects are missing.
At the end, you don't really get the sense that she has become this independent woman, but still the little girl she was at the beginning when she arrives at Thornfield.
The same goes for Mr. Rochester. In the book there's a moment where he dresses up as a gypsy to try break down Jane's defensive character. It's fun and playful scene in the book and really contrasts with his moments of pride and seriousness.
OrjanB
Impressive awkwardness, and I felt like the movie stayed true to the book's mood. Having the lovely Mia as a gray, girl-next-door type is a waste, but she played it well. I missed some chemistry between the protagonists. I preferred the Jane Eyre mini-series, and recommend it.Pristine
If you're thinking about watching one Jane Eyre-themed film, watch this one. Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender are breathtaking. The story is of course familiar to us all I believe, so there's nothing new about that.Lemonball679
Undoubtedly the best Jane Eyre adaptation to date. The setting and atmosphere captured the book perfectly. The narritive flowed beautifully but didnt feel the need to stick religiously to the flow of the book 100% which is a plus in my opinion. Wasikowska and Fassbender captured the essence of Jane and Rochester wonderfully. A marvellous film.Saraxx
Brilliant film. It's rare to enjoy a film so much when you have read the book but this really was great. They've got the characterisation of Jane and Rochester perfect. The mood, style, everything is reminiscent of the book. The best of all the adaptations I have seen. Does the book justice.daisyaday
I miss the "tenacious of life line." (when Rochester learns she went to Lowood)Rami
Bleargh O_O BBC's versione is the best, IMHO.Pickman
So gentle, wistful and deep... Close to a masterpiece, if not a masterpiece indeed.Fenring
GoodMaria la del cine
Beautifully executed. Not just another remake.albarns
Great version, and very truthful to the book.mandapuspi
It's all dark, gloomy and dreary. It has stars like Mia Wasikowska, Michael Fassbender and Jamie Bell. But still, I love the 2006's BBC's version more. Ruth Wilson is more of a Jane Eyre than Wasikowska and so Stephens of a Rochester than Fassbender.Besides, if only Fukunaga lightens up the tone, offers a bit color and adds more fun to the story, it will be the best version of Jane Eyre, like Roger Ebert claimed on his site.
However, as the reader of the novel, I think this one is more loyal to the novel, compared to the BBC's version.
Showing items 1 – 15 of 24