Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 9 of 9

dchauvin's avatar

dchauvin

Haven't seen Flags of our Fathers, but I appreciate what Clint was trying to do with this two-sided-double-feature-thingy. Wasn't a huge fan of the very very faded colour used, but I guess it helped add to the gloom and bleakness of the film. Despite one or two out of place looking CGI'd wide shots the action was elegantly crafted and distributed in good quantity. Jumping from present to 1945 and back at the beginning and end of the film was a nice touch, done effectively (unlike, for instance, the somewhat over-sentimental scenes that bookend Saving Private Ryan...).
11 years 9 months ago
Dieguito's avatar

Dieguito

Way better than the American side of the story.. Just by being exotic.. But the characters and cinematography are also better
12 years 7 months ago
myopia's avatar

myopia

Yes this is Eastwood at his absolute best. Stunning picture.
12 years 10 months ago
squeamish movie lover's avatar

squeamish movie lover

Classic and much better than the average Flags of Our Fathers.
14 years 4 months ago
martinkopperudandersen's avatar

martinkopperudandersen

Clint Eastwood at his best!
13 years 3 months ago
rwj's avatar

rwj

Ok movie, but nothing more... This movie does not live on story but its cinematografi...
13 years 9 months ago
chunkylefunga's avatar

chunkylefunga

Better than Flags of our fathers, Clint manages to make the viewer sympathise with a country who sided with the Nazi's.

Flags of our fathers doesn't need to be seen before seeing this film.
9 years 8 months ago
devilsadvocado's avatar

devilsadvocado

I guess I'm part of the 1% of filmgoers preferring the Western counterpart over this one.
12 years 3 months ago
audiopile's avatar

audiopile

i didn't get it.
13 years ago
View comments