Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 4 of 4

nick121235's avatar

nick121235

Reasonably entertaining. Probably a bit better than the previous entry in the series, Dracula Has Risen from the Grave.
This is the campiest one so far and I think it really works in the films favour, as the plot can seem a bit contrived.
The acting is okay, the sets are okay, the only really beautiful piece is the outside of the chapel.
I'm not sure why Dracula's blood had to turn to powder, there was no reason. It would have worked fine as actual blood.
7 years 1 month ago
Camille Deadpan's avatar

Camille Deadpan

Scarrier than Dracula Has Risen from the Grave (1968).
8 years 8 months ago
jktomas's avatar

jktomas

As good as the first Hammer's Dracula, but possibly even better. The acting is so entertaining to watch. The story is so fresh and intriguing for a vampire film. The atmosphere is what I love about Hammer films and this film creates it flawlessly. Very good horror movie.
9 years 5 months ago
daisyaday's avatar

daisyaday

A fun Hammer Dracula film where Dracula is curiously mostly absent.
11 years 5 months ago
View comments