Order by:

Add your comment

Do you want to let us know what you think? Just login, after which you will be redirected back here and you can leave your comments.

Comments 1 - 7 of 7

Ronet's avatar


Thank you, but our princess is in another castle! Probably the first bromance movie.
10 months ago
Siskoid's avatar


1940's The Thief of Bagdad, though a remake of a 1924 silent film, stands out as the main source material for Disney's Aladdin, if only on account of the villain being a sorcerer called Jaffar. The movie nevertheless splits the Aladdin role in two, with John Justin playing the fallen prince who must save the kingdom and the princess, and Sabu as the thief who finds a genie in a bottle (a genie more green than blue, but same difference). As special effects spectaculars go, The Thief of Bagdad surprises with its cutting-edge use of chromakey, a technique that wouldn't be put into wide use for decades (and is far from perfected here), and provides a lot of neat fantastical images, at least eventually. The magic doesn't really kick in until the second act. Evoking later movies like the Sinbad film Harryhausen worked on, it stands as a fun enough fantasy family film, a storybook come to life in vivid Technicolor. The plot is all over the place, but in the best fairy tale way.
2 years 2 months ago
Windill's avatar


It's a 1001 nights-type story. Part of the movie aged well, part of it didn't. Would deserve an update with modern effects and less racism.
2 years 3 months ago
tommy_leazaq's avatar


The 1924 version was way better
4 years ago
ClassicLady's avatar


That genie's toenails and fingernails really creeped me out! Otherwise, wonderful clarity, color, and detail.
8 years 1 month ago
Dieguito's avatar


Really, best cinematography this studio movie?? I've preferred the silent version.
8 years 8 months ago
geppetto's avatar


Sultan Jaffar (Conrad Veidt) is the most intelligent ,original ,stylish ,magical and greatest villian ever.
11 years 3 months ago
View comments