Remove ads

Information

Year
1971
Runtime
32 min.
Director
Stan Brakhage
Genres
Horror, Documentary, Short
Rating *
7.1
Votes *
1,257
Checks
1,202
Favs
78
Dislikes
30
Favs/checks
6.5% (1:15)
Favs/dislikes
3:1
* View IMDb information

Top comments

  1. Wise Jake's avatar

    Wise Jake

    Remarkable and disturbing. A stare into the face of death - a realization of the body as a mere shell. 8 years 6 months ago
  2. criscoJovan's avatar

    criscoJovan

    Fascinating.
    Not an easy one to stomach.

    I recommend viewing in silence.
    6 years 2 months ago
  3. the3rdman's avatar

    the3rdman

    For me, this film illustrated the tension between seeing, i.e. viewing objects from a subject position, and (for lack of better terms) sensibility or identification. On the one hand, there is a voyeuristic interest in seeing the human bodies dissected, deconstructed, and revealed to the observing eye. But instead of our own eye, we follow the eye of Brakhage's camera, so a certain distance is created that makes the experience somewhat more abstract. The extreme closeups for example achieve an almost purely visual aesthetic that only incorporates (again, for lack of a better term) the ethical or emotional by our own associations--what do these images mean to us when we recall that they are the bodies of human beings much like ourselves? Of course, it is these associations that tend to impress upon the viewer a sense of horror and of mortality, because we identify the bodies with our own to some extent. Their facelessness, however, creates distance; they are our own bodies but they are also not our own. At many times I began to think of them simply as things; and yet when Brakhage inserts footage of the careful cataloging of personal effects (for instance) I am reminded that they were recently living persons. I guess a large part of the film is about our relation to the body, one that seems ultimately ambiguous. These bodies are hard to relate to. Where is the spark that made them human?
    The irony is that what we have here is not "the act of seeing with one's own eyes," but rather a mediated seeing that substitutes the camera's eye for our own. Instead of observing what we will, we follow the trajectory of Brakhage's editing. I can't help but think that this distance is an important part of Brakhage's project. Is it something like the distance we seem to require when confronting mortality and fear? Or the distance one maintain's between oneself, the living subject, and the other? Can this distance be closed? How? What happens if it is? What happens if it cannot?
    5 years 1 month ago
See all comments

Friends

Login to see which of your friends have seen this movie!

Activity

  1. IamNotaNihilist checked this movie 5 days 1 hour ago
See more activity

In 8 official lists

  1. This movie ranks #2 in 100 Documentary Films (BFI Screen Guide)
    100 Documentary Films (BFI Screen Guide)'s icon

    100 Documentary Films (B…

    2
  2. This movie ranks #7 in Amos Vogel's Film as a Subversive Art
    Amos Vogel's Film as a Subversive Art's icon

    Amos Vogel's Film as a S…

    7
  3. This movie ranks #27 in Brief Encounters
    Brief Encounters's icon

    Brief Encounters

    27
  4. This movie ranks #84 in Anthology Film Archives' Essential Cinema
    Anthology Film Archives' Essential Cinema's icon

    Anthology Film Archives'…

    84
  5. This movie ranks #101 in Sight and Sound -The Greatest Documentaries of All Time
    Sight and Sound -The Greatest Documentaries of All Time's icon

    Sight and Sound -The Gre…

    101
  6. This movie ranks #190 in The Criterion Collection
    The Criterion Collection's icon

    The Criterion Collection

    190
  7. This movie ranks #610 in Jonathan Rosenbaum's Essential Films
    Jonathan Rosenbaum's Essential Films's icon

    Jonathan Rosenbaum's Ess…

    610
  8. This movie ranks #668 in Sight and Sound 2012 - Combined List
    Sight and Sound 2012 - Combined List's icon

    Sight and Sound 2012 - C…

    668
View all lists this movie is in