I'm sure this was meant to be one of those epic stories about vivid and wild love, but somehow it just didn't work for me.
I don't know if I really simply don't understand it or that it really was boring and faked and forced.
The only thing I did like was the clothing, the rest was a mystery to me, like the theatre. Yes, it was creative, but did it really add something to the story? I don't think so.
I also have no idea what the importance of that redhead to the story was, why was he even there?
Okay, I'm gonna stop now before I turn utterly bitchy.
Nice scene transitions, but it becomes a bit strange, maybe pretentious when almost everything is basically going to play on the theater scene and in the -salon, although there are clearly different places ... you understand when you watch the movie.
Not quite clear, I would definitely understand more if I read the classic book with the same name of Leo Tolstoy. The film lacked involvement, I was not moved - got really interested in the book, which I think gives so much more. Or serves as a foundation bolt before the film. This you only see once.
Vikander is doing well. Also nice with a dimmed roll for Jude Law. When can someone tell Knightley she's unhealthily thin?!
I love how Joe Wright directed this movie. I love the style of the movie. It's so stylist and it's great. Especially what for Seamus McGarvy did for the cinematography. All the style of this movie is great. I love it.
Add your comment
Comments 1 - 15 of 24
xxNicollable
I'm sure this was meant to be one of those epic stories about vivid and wild love, but somehow it just didn't work for me.I don't know if I really simply don't understand it or that it really was boring and faked and forced.
The only thing I did like was the clothing, the rest was a mystery to me, like the theatre. Yes, it was creative, but did it really add something to the story? I don't think so.
I also have no idea what the importance of that redhead to the story was, why was he even there?
Okay, I'm gonna stop now before I turn utterly bitchy.
thestaulker
I learned a valuable lesson from this movieMidfreewayfox
Stunning! Even tho the ending left me empty, like the story didn't finnish.halcain
Beautiful film! Loved the directing.LinaSurvives
Overwhelming in its prettiness. First half was incredibly entertaining, second half was too long.colindavidson
Jude Law isn't even the worst thing in this for once...oo
great gowns beautiful gownsEmiam
6/10Nice scene transitions, but it becomes a bit strange, maybe pretentious when almost everything is basically going to play on the theater scene and in the -salon, although there are clearly different places ... you understand when you watch the movie.
Not quite clear, I would definitely understand more if I read the classic book with the same name of Leo Tolstoy. The film lacked involvement, I was not moved - got really interested in the book, which I think gives so much more. Or serves as a foundation bolt before the film. This you only see once.
Vikander is doing well. Also nice with a dimmed roll for Jude Law. When can someone tell Knightley she's unhealthily thin?!
japhyryder
So like why did none of them have Russian accents?Joker of Gotham
Good acting, the movie was a little slow for me, I didn't like Anna Karenina character.A film that I would don´t be sad if I didn't see it again.
3/5
yourmelodi
I love this movie so much. It's so artistic and visually pleasing, adds a new meaning to aesthetic in films. New favorite movie.vivienblue_06
The setting is just magnificent. Joe Wright truly is wonderful...asafkharisma
I love how Joe Wright directed this movie. I love the style of the movie. It's so stylist and it's great. Especially what for Seamus McGarvy did for the cinematography. All the style of this movie is great. I love it.amir147
pretty good drama story.. :'(sad but true.. :|
sherlocksonlywoman
Visually stunning but poorly cast. Jude Law was the only well played character. I loved the theatre setting.Showing items 1 – 15 of 24